<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Frontline Financials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontlinefinancials.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com</link>
	<description>A Soldier's View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implications of Colonial Bank&#8217;s Failure by Hoody</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/08/14/implications-of-colonial-banks-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=124#comment-52</guid>
		<description>After looking into this more, I see now where the fed won’t let the FDIC go broke, it will just “bail” them out as all the other broke items. Even the stock pusher clowns on CNBC incl the one with the noise making machine say so. Only thing I guess would be next question though is if a “big” bank was to go, just how long would the FDIC decide it wanted to take to pay the “insured” accounts? My guess is a while. So I use 3 different banks and maybe even a 4th to spread things around as not all banks in my area are 5 star rated, they are 3 to 5. But I figure they won’t ALL go at the same time. ( I hope  ) No reason to keep it in cash cause if the situation gets as bad as some think, the paper won’t be worth shit either, and since you don’t have a Ft Knox you probably won’t have that much gold around either, besides a lb of meat is edible, a lb of gold just sits there, if I had the meat why would I want the gold?

So relax, keep “some” cash available but keep the rest in the bank, you’ll get it back some time lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After looking into this more, I see now where the fed won’t let the FDIC go broke, it will just “bail” them out as all the other broke items. Even the stock pusher clowns on CNBC incl the one with the noise making machine say so. Only thing I guess would be next question though is if a “big” bank was to go, just how long would the FDIC decide it wanted to take to pay the “insured” accounts? My guess is a while. So I use 3 different banks and maybe even a 4th to spread things around as not all banks in my area are 5 star rated, they are 3 to 5. But I figure they won’t ALL go at the same time. ( I hope  ) No reason to keep it in cash cause if the situation gets as bad as some think, the paper won’t be worth shit either, and since you don’t have a Ft Knox you probably won’t have that much gold around either, besides a lb of meat is edible, a lb of gold just sits there, if I had the meat why would I want the gold?</p>
<p>So relax, keep “some” cash available but keep the rest in the bank, you’ll get it back some time lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Current CD Rates by Hoody</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/21/thoughts-on-current-cd-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=102#comment-51</guid>
		<description>After looking into this more, I see now where the fed won’t let the FDIC go broke, it will just “bail” them out as all the other broke items. Even the stock pusher clowns on CNBC incl the one with the noise making machine say so. Only thing I guess would be next question though is if a “big” bank was to go, just how long would the FDIC decide it wanted to take to pay the “insured” accounts? My guess is a while. So I use 3 different banks and maybe even a 4th to spread things around as not all banks in my area are 5 star rated, they are 3 to 5. But I figure they won’t ALL go at the same time. ( I hope  ) No reason to keep it in cash cause if the situation gets as bad as some think, the paper won’t be worth shit either, and since you don’t have a Ft Knox you probably won’t have that much gold around either, besides a lb of meat is edible, a lb of gold just sits there, if I had the meat why would I want the gold?

So relax, keep “some” cash available but keep the rest in the bank, you’ll get it back some time lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After looking into this more, I see now where the fed won’t let the FDIC go broke, it will just “bail” them out as all the other broke items. Even the stock pusher clowns on CNBC incl the one with the noise making machine say so. Only thing I guess would be next question though is if a “big” bank was to go, just how long would the FDIC decide it wanted to take to pay the “insured” accounts? My guess is a while. So I use 3 different banks and maybe even a 4th to spread things around as not all banks in my area are 5 star rated, they are 3 to 5. But I figure they won’t ALL go at the same time. ( I hope  ) No reason to keep it in cash cause if the situation gets as bad as some think, the paper won’t be worth shit either, and since you don’t have a Ft Knox you probably won’t have that much gold around either, besides a lb of meat is edible, a lb of gold just sits there, if I had the meat why would I want the gold?</p>
<p>So relax, keep “some” cash available but keep the rest in the bank, you’ll get it back some time lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Current CD Rates by Hoody</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/21/thoughts-on-current-cd-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=102#comment-46</guid>
		<description>OK thanks for the long drill Admin,  I think your right about the bonds terminology is what probably got me mixed up on all this stuff.

I seen times like this before, with rates well below what they were prior, I managed to ride it through than and guess I&#039;ll do the same now, from what I experienced in the past, when this snail starts back up, there will be a brief time to lock in long term again, as it will also again slow as usual. 

The way I see things I think  Ben and the boys are doin their damnedest to &quot;make&quot; anybody with any savings spend it by making it so damned hard to save it now, while BS&#039;ing everybody into believing they&#039;re getting some sort of great &quot;non-Inflation&quot; price for what they wana sell you, yeah right. My bills haven&#039;t fallen per the inflation, my food cost and energy costs are just as high or higher than last year. I don&#039;t buy 10 tons of steel a week which may be what they are talkin bout, to dump in the back yard.

I&#039;ll truck along as I always have, its worked for me, but it is hard when a good rate CD comes due now and swallow when the bank grins at you and asks you what you wana do now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK thanks for the long drill Admin,  I think your right about the bonds terminology is what probably got me mixed up on all this stuff.</p>
<p>I seen times like this before, with rates well below what they were prior, I managed to ride it through than and guess I&#8217;ll do the same now, from what I experienced in the past, when this snail starts back up, there will be a brief time to lock in long term again, as it will also again slow as usual. </p>
<p>The way I see things I think  Ben and the boys are doin their damnedest to &#8220;make&#8221; anybody with any savings spend it by making it so damned hard to save it now, while BS&#8217;ing everybody into believing they&#8217;re getting some sort of great &#8220;non-Inflation&#8221; price for what they wana sell you, yeah right. My bills haven&#8217;t fallen per the inflation, my food cost and energy costs are just as high or higher than last year. I don&#8217;t buy 10 tons of steel a week which may be what they are talkin bout, to dump in the back yard.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll truck along as I always have, its worked for me, but it is hard when a good rate CD comes due now and swallow when the bank grins at you and asks you what you wana do now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Current CD Rates by admin</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/21/thoughts-on-current-cd-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=102#comment-44</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s definitely a great question.  The first and simplest answer is that, for the most part, all interest rates on all debt tend to move in the same direction.  A great analogy I&#039;ve used in the past is to think about the  interest rate market as a traffic jam.  For the most part, if you&#039;re stuck in traffic, switching lanes and trying to move up faster than everyone else is almost always useless.  All the cars in the traffic jam are going to eventually move at about the same rate of speed.  

To speak directly to your question concerning the Treasuries-

Treasuries are an important part of the world debt market.  This is primarily because Treasuries, even now, are considered &quot;risk free&quot; meaning you are 100% guaranteed to get your money plus the stated interest rate at the end of the term.  As long as they are considered risk free, Treasury interest rates should always be lower than any debt you can buy.  Keep in mind, CD&#039;s are actually a form of debt for banks.  You&#039;re lending the bank the money.  So basically, if Treasury interest rates are going up, CD rates will tend to follow that trend.  If Treasury interest rates are going down, CD rates will also follow that trend.  

I think you might be a little confused on some of the language commentators use (and misuse) when speaking about Treasuries.  For all bonds, including Treasuries, there is a face value, a bond price, and a coupon price.  The face value is the amount of money you will receive at the end of the term of the bond.  The bond price is set by the market, and it might be above or below the face value, depending on what interest rates have done since the bond was first created.  The coupon price is the interest rate that you are paid until the maturity of the bond.  I&#039;ll spare you some time with my own explanation and point you to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_relationship_between_interest_rates_and_bond_prices&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here &lt;/a&gt; to check out the mathmatical explanation.  Basically, when bond prices rise, interest rates on those bonds fall.  When bond prices fall, interest rates on those bonds rise.  I think this might be what you have in mind when you talk about the inverse relationship.  

To sum it up:  If Treasury interest rates rise, CD interest rates will also rise.  If Treasury interest rates fall, CD interest rates will also fall.  The key is to hone in on what the interest rates are, which can be very confusing to follow at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s definitely a great question.  The first and simplest answer is that, for the most part, all interest rates on all debt tend to move in the same direction.  A great analogy I&#8217;ve used in the past is to think about the  interest rate market as a traffic jam.  For the most part, if you&#8217;re stuck in traffic, switching lanes and trying to move up faster than everyone else is almost always useless.  All the cars in the traffic jam are going to eventually move at about the same rate of speed.  </p>
<p>To speak directly to your question concerning the Treasuries-</p>
<p>Treasuries are an important part of the world debt market.  This is primarily because Treasuries, even now, are considered &#8220;risk free&#8221; meaning you are 100% guaranteed to get your money plus the stated interest rate at the end of the term.  As long as they are considered risk free, Treasury interest rates should always be lower than any debt you can buy.  Keep in mind, CD&#8217;s are actually a form of debt for banks.  You&#8217;re lending the bank the money.  So basically, if Treasury interest rates are going up, CD rates will tend to follow that trend.  If Treasury interest rates are going down, CD rates will also follow that trend.  </p>
<p>I think you might be a little confused on some of the language commentators use (and misuse) when speaking about Treasuries.  For all bonds, including Treasuries, there is a face value, a bond price, and a coupon price.  The face value is the amount of money you will receive at the end of the term of the bond.  The bond price is set by the market, and it might be above or below the face value, depending on what interest rates have done since the bond was first created.  The coupon price is the interest rate that you are paid until the maturity of the bond.  I&#8217;ll spare you some time with my own explanation and point you to <a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_relationship_between_interest_rates_and_bond_prices" rel="nofollow">here </a> to check out the mathmatical explanation.  Basically, when bond prices rise, interest rates on those bonds fall.  When bond prices fall, interest rates on those bonds rise.  I think this might be what you have in mind when you talk about the inverse relationship.  </p>
<p>To sum it up:  If Treasury interest rates rise, CD interest rates will also rise.  If Treasury interest rates fall, CD interest rates will also fall.  The key is to hone in on what the interest rates are, which can be very confusing to follow at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Current CD Rates by Hoody</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/21/thoughts-on-current-cd-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=102#comment-43</guid>
		<description>So just what is the effect on CD.s from Treasury notes/bills rates? If the treasury stuff has a high rate does that mean CD rates are low, or does it mean they go higher?

I&#039;m not sure what the deal is here, cause I heard if one is higher the other is lower and visa vrsa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just what is the effect on CD.s from Treasury notes/bills rates? If the treasury stuff has a high rate does that mean CD rates are low, or does it mean they go higher?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the deal is here, cause I heard if one is higher the other is lower and visa vrsa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Current CD Rates by admin</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/21/thoughts-on-current-cd-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=102#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Brief walk through history to provide a good answer:

There used to be much more emphasis on Savings and Loans being distinct from Commercial Banks.  S&amp;L&#039;s typically funded mortgage obligations with terms of 15-30 years with deposits that were typically longer-maturities.  This allowed them to match maturities and stabalize net interest margin more effectively.  The most crucial reason for this long term funding on the deposit side was so that there was no liquidity crisis- i.e. they didn&#039;t have very short term deposits funding very long term mortgages. 

Now, what &quot;commercial bankers&quot; typically do is more short term funding on the deposit side to fund much more short term loans.  When you start getting out to three and five years on the deposit side, you start having a very very difficult time managing your net interest margin effectively, since your loans generally have maturities far shorter than that.   For any banker with half a brain, though, as your comment expressly states, this is the exact time to bet some of your capital on a long term inflation hedge.  In banking that hedge is absolutely straightforward- you lock in long term deposits and allow your assets (loans) to reprice much more quickly.  This maximizes the spread.  

To answer your question more directly though, the reason why a lot of (community) bankers won&#039;t take advantage of this is because they simply are too conservative or not sophisticated enough to get out into these longer term deposit maturities.  The treasury yields pretty much dictate what the yield curve is, so it&#039;s not hard to price these things at market rates, but it&#039;s the risk involved in locking yourself in for that long without being able to project what your assets will look like that scares people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brief walk through history to provide a good answer:</p>
<p>There used to be much more emphasis on Savings and Loans being distinct from Commercial Banks.  S&#038;L&#8217;s typically funded mortgage obligations with terms of 15-30 years with deposits that were typically longer-maturities.  This allowed them to match maturities and stabalize net interest margin more effectively.  The most crucial reason for this long term funding on the deposit side was so that there was no liquidity crisis- i.e. they didn&#8217;t have very short term deposits funding very long term mortgages. </p>
<p>Now, what &#8220;commercial bankers&#8221; typically do is more short term funding on the deposit side to fund much more short term loans.  When you start getting out to three and five years on the deposit side, you start having a very very difficult time managing your net interest margin effectively, since your loans generally have maturities far shorter than that.   For any banker with half a brain, though, as your comment expressly states, this is the exact time to bet some of your capital on a long term inflation hedge.  In banking that hedge is absolutely straightforward- you lock in long term deposits and allow your assets (loans) to reprice much more quickly.  This maximizes the spread.  </p>
<p>To answer your question more directly though, the reason why a lot of (community) bankers won&#8217;t take advantage of this is because they simply are too conservative or not sophisticated enough to get out into these longer term deposit maturities.  The treasury yields pretty much dictate what the yield curve is, so it&#8217;s not hard to price these things at market rates, but it&#8217;s the risk involved in locking yourself in for that long without being able to project what your assets will look like that scares people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Current CD Rates by samson</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/21/thoughts-on-current-cd-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>samson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=102#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Interesting argument, Raymond.  I do wonder, however, why other enterprising bankers (such as yourself, perhaps?) are not willing to compete for these profits from saver naïvete by offering even higher long-term CD rates?  Is the market for long-term CDs somehow not competitive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting argument, Raymond.  I do wonder, however, why other enterprising bankers (such as yourself, perhaps?) are not willing to compete for these profits from saver naïvete by offering even higher long-term CD rates?  Is the market for long-term CDs somehow not competitive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Can&#8217;t Handle the Truth! by admin</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/17/you-cant-handle-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=87#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Amen brother.  I love all the commentary on Bank of America during this earnings season and even in the previous one.  Merrill is now the driving force behind a substantial portion of its profit.  This just highlights how dumb of a move invoking the MAC would have been.  Sometimes it takes a real leader to not worry about the immediate and very short term pain of taking the damn shot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen brother.  I love all the commentary on Bank of America during this earnings season and even in the previous one.  Merrill is now the driving force behind a substantial portion of its profit.  This just highlights how dumb of a move invoking the MAC would have been.  Sometimes it takes a real leader to not worry about the immediate and very short term pain of taking the damn shot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Can&#8217;t Handle the Truth! by Benjamin Walls</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/17/you-cant-handle-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=87#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the truth hurts, but in this case the truth while yet painful in the short-term to the shareholders of BOA in the longterm will be prosperous. 

Great analogy of the situation. It is easy for Congress to sit back and critize the people on the front lines making the tough decisions, however it is a good thing they were sitting back or we would be in a lot worse shape then BOA owing the taxpayers and diluting the shareholders in the short-term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the truth hurts, but in this case the truth while yet painful in the short-term to the shareholders of BOA in the longterm will be prosperous. </p>
<p>Great analogy of the situation. It is easy for Congress to sit back and critize the people on the front lines making the tough decisions, however it is a good thing they were sitting back or we would be in a lot worse shape then BOA owing the taxpayers and diluting the shareholders in the short-term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fall of Georgia Banking by Benjamin Walls</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/06/16/the-fall-of-georgia-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=66#comment-11</guid>
		<description>When is the continuation of the article coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the continuation of the article coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

