<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frontline Financials &#187; mortgage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontlinefinancials.com/tag/mortgage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com</link>
	<description>A Soldier's View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Implications of Colonial Bank&#8217;s Failure</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/08/14/implications-of-colonial-banks-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/08/14/implications-of-colonial-banks-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Full Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and Whitaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BB&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line of credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's big news out today, folks.  Colonial bank is very likely to fail toda, August, 14th, 2009, and there are a lot of reasons you should care. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s big news out today, folks.  Colonial bank is very likely to fail today, August, 14th, 2009, and there are a lot of reasons you should care.</p>
<p>First, Colonial received a major investment from a now bankrupt business, Taylor, Bean, and Whitaker.  This company funded and facilitated a huge number of mortgages, particularly in the southeast region.  But that&#8217;s old news.</p>
<p>Second, Colonial&#8217;s failure was leaked prior to its actually being shut down and placed into receivorship.  This is a huge issue.  There are two schools of thought on this.  The first is the most simple: somebody leaked the information at BB&amp;T, Colonial, or the FDIC out of pure stupidity.  There&#8217;s a good reason that the public isn&#8217;t notified when a bank is going to close.  It saves that bank, usually, from having a run and costing the FDIC even more money.  The second reason is a little more complex and underhanded.  Somebody might have purposely leaked the news that the extremely strong BB&amp;T was going to buy the deposits of the very weak Colonial, because Colonial was <em>already</em> seeing a run on deposits.  The first instance is extremely problematic; the second, extremely smart.  We&#8217;ll have to wait and see what really happened.</p>
<p>Third, Colonial bank received TARP money after getting a similarly large amount of private investment.  It received $550 million tax payer dollars, to be exact.  Recently, the TARP inspector general (aka TARP czar) raided offices of the bank alleging fraud that probably would have kept the bank from receiving funds.  As an FYI, a number of bankers and investment professionals that I have spoken with agreed with me when I was astounded and angered that Colonial received funds in the first place.  They&#8217;ve been failing for quite some time.  There goes $550 million down the tubes that was only supposed to be invested in the strongest and/or most systemically important financial institutions.  There&#8217;s a scandal brewing here, just wait.</p>
<p>Finally, and this is the biggest future news of all, the FDIC is going to run out of its self-funded reserve for losses.  This means that it&#8217;s likely that it will tap its line of credit at the Treasury.  This isn&#8217;t the first time this has happened, and you shouldn&#8217;t panic, but it&#8217;s one more bit of shocking fall out from the financial disaster that we&#8217;re desperately trying to get behind us.  Let me repeat, the FDIC is about to run out of its own money and start relying on taxpayers.  Can the government handle it? Absolutely.  Does this highlight how bad our situation was and continues to be? Absolutely.  Most importantly- Are your deposits still safe? Absolutely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/08/14/implications-of-colonial-banks-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fall of Georgia Banking … (Past performance does not necessarily indicate future performance)</title>
		<link>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/20/the-fall-of-georgia-banking-%e2%80%a6-past-performance-does-not-necessarily-indicate-future-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/20/the-fall-of-georgia-banking-%e2%80%a6-past-performance-does-not-necessarily-indicate-future-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Full Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sub-prime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontlinefinancials.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Through all this, a very important lesson was re-learned by many bankers: past performance does not necessarily indicate future performance.  Populations will not grow endlessly, home values will not rise endlessly, people will not be able to sustain high levels of debt endlessly. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first three issues we dove into were all related to basic supply and demand.  The major point of my argument surrounding the number of bank presidents, huge numbers of new banks, and “flipping” banks was this:  When the supply of banks exceeds the demand for banks, banks will tend to go out of business or consolidate. </p>
<p> You see this all the time with all kinds of products and businesses.  You even see this specifically with banks during the best of times as areas grow and mature.  Branches close or are consolidated pretty regularly. </p>
<p> The next set of issues I’d like to deal with are a bit more complex, but truly set the stage for one of the biggest “bubbles” in the history of the world, and more specifically, Georgia.  They are:</p>
<p>1.  Explosive population growth and projections of continued growth</p>
<p>2.  Unsustainable growth in debt, and</p>
<p>3.  Sub-prime mortgages</p>
<p> The latter two were (and continue to be) national issues.  The population growth was more specifically in Georgia, but we also saw it in places like Las Vegas, Phoenix, Florida coastal areas, and some other pockets around the country.</p>
<p> Growth in population is generally a wonderful economic driver.  At one point Georgia was home to some of the fastest growing populations in the country.  For years, counties like Coweta, Henry, Cobb, and Fulton experienced unprecedented and what seemed like endless growth.  This shift was happening as the business environment got much better and more sophisticated in the Metro-Atlanta region.  Georgia is also one of the best states for entrepreneurs and most  businesses because of pro-business labor laws and a helpful tax code.  When coupled with a generally good climate, lots of relatively cheap land and homes, and some good ole’ southern charm, Georgia and specifically Metro-Atlanta looked like a wonderful new place to call home.</p>
<p> All of this sounds great so far, doesn’t it?  Why on earth would population growth be a “cause” of a banking melt-down?  The answer is simple- people thought that it would continue, without interruption, forever. </p>
<p> Builders and banks especially believed this enormous myth.  The faster the populations grew, the faster banks lent money to builders who built increasingly larger numbers of homes.  They failed to realize that just like the much larger economy, population growth is generally cyclical unless you’re in a third world country. It might always be growing, but sometimes it grows faster than others, and there will almost always be some upper limit.  When the growth in number of homes that banks were financing the construction of began to rapidly exceed the number of families moving into the area, there became a huge oversupply.</p>
<p> Banks were eventually forced to foreclose on a huge number of the <em>new</em> constructions.  These were houses that had never been lived in and in many cases weren’t even finished.  Because of the huge oversupply, banks were forced to write down values at a rapid rate.</p>
<p> Everyone also knows that homes have to sit on a piece of land.  Banks were increasingly financing more and more land to be developed into subdivisions to support this huge, “infinite” population growth.  It’s the land, especially, that has and will continue to bring down the community banks.  This is where the largest write downs have been.  Land, if it sells at all, is only selling for thirty to fifty cents on-the-dollar.  That means for every dollar a bank had loaned on a piece of foreclosed land, it can only sell it if they’re willing to lose seventy cents on it. </p>
<p> What ultimately caused the housing boom and bust in Georgia, as with everywhere else, were subprime mortgages.  There’s a twist to this story for community banks in Georgia however, and it’s very important.  Most community banks don’t actually provide the funds for the mortgages that they make.   The banks that have failed so far in Georgia actually held almost no “Sub-Prime Mortgages.” </p>
<p> The problem was the home ownership and building boom that those mortgages created.  Community banks were the ones that generally financed the builder’s land purchase and construction costs.  That builder would then sell the house to whoever could get the financing, and then pay off the community bank with the proceeds from the sale.  The community bank didn’t care who bought the house, but they should have.</p>
<p> A large and growing number of the sales would never have happened under more “traditional” environments.  Everyone is well aware of all the asinine practices that were going on in the mortgage market like stated income loans, Alt-A mortgages, 105% loans, etc.  Had community bankers and regulators been more aware of these buyers, they might have been able to better slow down this clearly overheated market. </p>
<p> Finally, there was an unbelievable explosion in the level of debt for average households across the nation.  Because everyone and their mother and sometimes even their dead grandmother could get a mortgage, there was a huge expansion of mortgage debt.  Also, because home values were rising at an unprecedented rate and people were spending far more than they actually made, there was also an extremely big boom in home equity lines of credit.  It is now well known that this level of debt creation could not be sustained.  When home prices plummeted, home equity lines became worthless and the huge amount of debt outstanding relative to the new values of homes created a recipe for disaster for many banks.  To summarize Warren Buffett:  Debt is like gasoline in a car.  It can make the car go 100mph in a heartbeat.  But, when the car crashes, it’s also the gasoline that blows it up.</p>
<p> Through all this, a very important lesson was re-learned by many bankers: past performance does not necessarily indicate future performance.  Populations will not grow endlessly, home values will not rise endlessly, people will not be able to sustain high levels of debt endlessly. </p>
<p> In the next couple of posts, I’ll be moving on from these more general issues that contributed to the Georgia debacle and diving headfirst into more complicated, but critical problems that brought down our banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frontlinefinancials.com/2009/07/20/the-fall-of-georgia-banking-%e2%80%a6-past-performance-does-not-necessarily-indicate-future-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
